Frequently Asked Questions # 5

Biblical Universalism (Evangelical Inclusivism) before 1980?

      The following quote is repeated from FAQ #4: "According to this kind of theology, we ought to think of being saved as the normal outcome and being rejected as the exception, and not the other way around. I think we have erred in thinking of condemnation as the ordinary and salvation as the extraordinary outcome of the history of divine redemption" (Dr. Clark Pinnock, 1987). I noted: "'This kind of theology' is a rather accurate description of Biblical Universalism."

      In FAQ #4 I noted: "For nearly four decades I have been looking for, and asking others to look for, evidence of 'this kind of theology.' If any of my readers or if Dr. Pinnock can provide evidence of "this kind of theology" being published before 1980 I would be ever so grateful to hear about it. I will present all such evidence in a future posting." I herewith do so.

Response of Dr. Clark Pinnock

      Pinnock graciously replied by way of a 15-minute telephone call. We renewed our acquaintance. He knew of no earlier published example of "this kind of theology." He asked to be added to my mailing list and suggested I ask this question of Dr. Roger Olson, professor at Truett Theological Seminary.

                                                          Response of Dr. Roger Olson

      Dr. Roger Olson, whose book The Story of Christian Theology won Christianity Today's 2000 Book Award, responded by email saying: "I do not know of any systematic theology prior to your own publications that spells out the nature of salvation as you do. But I hear distant echoes of it (foreshadowings, adumbrations) in Athanasius and perhaps other early church fathers" (Quoted with permission.).

Dr. John Sanders

      Another considerate reader called my attention to "The Perennial Debate" (Christianity Today, May 14, 1990). This article by Dr. John Sanders is an overview of the way various theological perspectives have wrestled with the question of salvation for those who have never heard of Christ. I count 21 different perspectives or nuances in Sander's article beginning with the early church to the present day. None of them reflect the approach of Biblical Universalism. Check this out for yourself at www.christianityonline.com/. In the "Quick Inquiry" section type "Perennial Debate" and Sander's overview comes up.

      I sent a copy of FAQ #4 to Dr. Sanders. He responded: "I'm not familiar with anyone who has gone at this in the way you frame it. That does not mean no one has. It would be interesting to look at the early fathers with this in mind, but I've not time for it now." Dr. Sanders is Associate Professor of Philosophy and Religion at Huntington College in Huntington, Indiana.

Rev. James L. Vanderlaan

      Another reply came from the Rev. James L. Vanderlaan, Director of Disability Concerns for CRPM, and is quoted with his permission:

"Dear Neal, Thank you for your persistence in advancing the perspective you hold. I personally am not sure that your position is demanded by biblical exegesis, but I do think it is permitted by sound exegesis and I myself hold it. I remember being part of a Bible discussion group back in the sixties and proposing roughly what you later wrote. (I am not claiming to be your predecessor.) One of the people there then said, 'What is the motivation for mission work in that case?' My answer was 'How can God tolerate our leaving people in their despair a moment longer when he has given us such good news for them?' May the Lord renew your strength! Jim Vanderlaan"

       An alert reader brought this interesting quote from C.S. Lewis to my attention:

            "We do know that no man can be saved except through Christ; we                do not know that only those who know Him can be saved through               Him." (C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, p65, Macmillan, NY, 1952)

      Nevertheless, there is no published evidence that the perspective of Biblical Universalism (Evangelical Inclusivism) has been advocated or refuted before 1980. This, in itself, proves nothing. However, it suggests that "framing the subject" as I have warrants being researched.

 

Back to Frequently Asked Questions

Contact the Author, Neal Punt at: whenindoubt3@charter.net

© 2002 by Northland Books. Box 63, Allendale MI 49401. Unlimited permission to copy and distribute this document without altering text is hereby granted if this source is acknowledged.

 


Copyright 2003 Northland Books